Red December

NOTE: This World War II story was written by my ninety-seven-year old friend, Roger Isaacs, who is remembering his Army training and action in France with the 87th Division. I put this up onMemorial Day 2023 in honor of Roger and all the other American men who fought in the European and Pacific theaters.   I begin Roger’s story when he is transferred from  Madison, Wisconsin to Ft., Georgia.

Fort Benning was another world.  It was staffed by older, hardened regular army men who’d been in service since the 30’s.  They made my “tough” physics professor seem like the soul of sweetness.

Now we went from dream dorms to bare barracks: Orders: “All you little $$#@%s getup, it’s 3:00 in the morning!  Scrub them floors!”  Not good enough.  5:00 a.m. you did it all over again.

Marches for miles in the scorching Georgia heat.  Push ups, sit ups rope climbing up walls, crawl on your belly under live fire, “Get your f—-ing fat faces down!”  Firing range with many kinds of weapons.  Every muscle in still soft bodies aching.  Back to barracks.  Scrub them again. Up at 4:00.  Repeat the day. Gradually we toughened. We couldn’t wait to get out of this hellhole and back to school! 

But near the end of Basic an order came from on high.  The ASTP program with its 110,000 students was to be closed due to the need for men overseas.  In an instant, instead of going back to school at Madison, we were sent to Fort Jackson in Columbia South Carolina to join the 87th Infantry Division.  (Shades of my physics prof!)

I also wasn’t a kid any more.  I quickly grasped that you either learned “the army way,” or life could be pretty rough.  If you didn’t cross the non-coms who were over you things went fairly smoothly.  You were treated like a man, and if you didn’t act like one woe be to you!  The “F” word became an integral part of vocabulary and if not utilized on a regular basis you were immediately suspect. (To this day, when I get really angry those choice wartime words come tumbling  out.)

Most of our days were taken up with the same activities we practiced at Benning with added duties such as KP (kitchen police), i.e. peeling potatoes, washing dishes, mopping floors, etc.  In addition, KP was used as punishment for recalcitrant soldiers.  I always felt it was also part of the unarticulated process of slowly wearing away any feeling of importance or individuality.  This would continue on a downhill slope throughout my active stay in the army.

One day we were on the firing range for rifle practice.  We were alternating between using the mostly employed M1 rifle and its big brother, the lethal ancestor from World War 1, the Browning Automatic Rifle, the BAR. It was a particularly hot day and sweat was pouring down my face over my army issue steel rimmed glasses.  I was using the BAR, firing away through the befogged spectacles when the sergeant in charge came up to me and said, “Private, do you know you hit the bullseye every time?  You’re going to be our BAR man!”  Oh boy!  Just great!  At the time I was still growing, so let’s say I was 5’8 or 9 of the almost 5’ll I was eventually to reach and probably weighed 128 or 129 lbs.  Now the BAR loaded, with a loaded bandolier came to almost 40 pounds.  (The M1 loaded same way came to about 25 lbs.)  If you were marching with the weapon and full field pack, I’m told you were lugging 98.69 pounds.

The basic makeup of a rifle squad was supposed to be 9 to 12 men, a squad leader, grenadiers, riflemen and 2 BAR men.  In ours I was the sole BAR man.  Because of its weight, the BAR was to be passed down the line every 15 minutes or so on a march to relieve the BAR man.  This never happened.  I carried it, and once in a while someone would take it for a few minutes.

So we were “married,” the BAR and I, until almost death did us part.  I had to know how to break it down and reassemble it in minutes, keep it sparkling clean inside and out, and otherwise just live with it.

We continued the interminable training for almost a year, and finally orders came to prepare to go overseas.

We left Fort Jackson and went to a harbor in New York City to board the Queen Elizabeth, largest ocean liner in the world, for our “vacation” to we knew not where!  

No longer a luxury liner, the Elizabeth was outfitted to carry a total of 17,000 “passengers” and crew.  Most men were  assigned to specified quarters on the ship and ordered to stay there.  Most men didn’t want to move from their bunks anyway.  They were too sick.  

The Elizabeth took only 5 days to cross the ocean in a zig zag fashion, so fast, I was told, it didn’t need armed escort ships for protection.

We entered port at Gourock Scotland on October 22, 1944, one day short of my 19th birthday.  Then on to a little town, Stone, in England.  The officers were put up in an old mansion, and we tented on its grounds, which were soaked with rain and covered with mud.

Not all bad.  Passes to London to see the sights, which by now were terribly scarred by the results of constant German bombing.  Learned to know the sound of the unmanned German V-1 or buzz bombs flying overhead.  As long as you heard their weird sound it was ok, but when the sound suddenly stopped, it meant they were ready to drop and do their terrible destruction.  The Londoners took it all in stride and, depending on the danger, either made for bomb shelters or went about their daily routines as well as possible.

Time came to cross the English channel for France.  There we boarded “Forty and Eights.”  These were old boxcars so named because they held either 40 men or eight horses.  Chugged slowly along the French countryside with signs of previous battles all the way.  We debarked from the train and marched some miles to the area of Metz.  It was then I learned to sleep while marching.

Quoting from the 87th Division History “On 5 December the Division began its movement to the combat area in the vicinity of Metz where the 345th  Regimental Combat Team was committed to preliminary action …to assist in the reduction of the remaining fortresses surrounding that city.”  We were quartered at Fort Driant, the largest of the enormous fortresses, surrounding Metz that had finally surrendered after months of fruitless battles by U.S. forces.  Here we learned we were now part of General George Patton’s 3rd Army.  These forts were massive structures built by the Germans in the early part of the 20th century, constructed of concrete and steel and extending to tunnels deep underground.  One of these was Fort Jeanne d’arc.  It had not yet been captured and was busy lobbing shells at us in Driant. At night we were sent out on scouting parties to send back reports on anything we might see.  One night I was on one led by a very green, young lieutenant.  He spotted a cat coming out of the dark and evidently concluded that it represented the entire German army.  He completely lost his cool and fired at it.  He was successful in killing the “enemy” cat and also bringing down a barrage of fire from the real enemy at Jeanne de arc.  We managed to get back to the safety of our fort, but I never knew if there were suggestions from above as to what to do with that courageous cat killer.

Fort Jeanne d’arc was taken, and we moved out from Metz and into the Saar Region, which at the time was held by Germany.  By now it was freezing cold and snow and rain were constant. We were outside all the time. Keeping warm was impossible.  We kept our socks warm by alternately tucking them in our shirts against our skin and putting them back on for short periods.  Foxholes were dug, and we would lie two by two to try to keep warm in the little time there was to try to get some sleep.  Rations were short, finally down to chocolate bars, which were so concentrated you could only eat a piece at a time without getting sick.  Equipment was also in short supply, so, instead of the more protective combat boots, we were issued lightweight rubber galoshes, causing almost everyone to get trench foot. (Much later, when I finally got back behind the combat zone, I noted the men in Headquarters companies jauntily sporting the combat boots.) 

On December 17, 1944 we were moving through a woods, ostensibly to take a town beyond it.  We were firing against light counter fire when suddenly “all hell broke loose.”  We were facing every kind of weaponry you could imagine. We were being shelled by the pinpoint accuracy of the 88mm guns of the German Tiger tanks, small arms fire and, I later learned, even from our own misaimed artillery from behind our own lines.  Hard to believe, but I remember the noise of the exploding shells was so earsplitting it affected the olfactory nerves and you could smell it. 

I was moving forward, firing the BAR when all of a sudden a 2 by 4 board hit me as hard as it could, and I went down and out.  Well, it felt like a 2 by 4, but was actually a bullet going through my right shoulder.  In the chaos someone, maybe a medic, came along and strapped a makeshift tourniquet on my arm to stop the bleeding, helped me up and back toward our lines.  The tourniquet worked itself off three times, three times I passed out and three times someone strapped it on and got me going again.  

What was happening was the company was in full retreat from the terrific German attack.  Adding to the noise from the shelling were the terrible screams of men being killed or wounded.

We didn’t know it at the time, but on December 16, 1944 the Germans launched a huge attack all the way from where we were to Belgium.  It was to be known as the “Battle of the Bulge.”  It resulted in the largest number of casualties in WWII.  Figures vary, but roughly almost 20,000 were killed, 47,000 wounded and 23,000 were captured or missing.  It was to last from that day until January 25, 1945.  As I was later to understand most of our Company E men were either killed or wounded that first day.  This included our Company Commander and First Sergeant, wounded, and my buddy Charlie Titone, killed.  

When I was finally taken behind the lines, I was put down along with others who were waiting for ambulances.  It was night now, very dark.  Several of us were loaded into an ambulance, and we took off in that deep dark.  For just a few minutes.  Not being able to see (headlights out for  safety), the ambulance went off the snow covered road and tilted halfway over.  I have no idea how it was righted, but we eventually got under way and on to a miniscule field hospital not far behind the lines.  As I remember, it was there a preliminary closing of the wound was done.

I do know it was in an area of immediate danger and that I will never forget the incomparable courage of the nurses, risking their lives to tend to  the wounded that terrible night.

Next move was to a hospital in the town of Bar le duc, France.  There it was determined the bullet had split the artery and vein in my shoulder causing an aneurism, and it had hit the nerves paralyzing my entire right arm and hand.  I also had shrapnel in my back. It was obvious to the surgeons that much more had to be done. 

It was at the hospital at Bar le duc that PFC Isaacs became a General, or, at least was treated like one.  In conversation with the wonderful army nurses there I learned that the entire nursing staff was from Michael Reese Hospital in Chicago.  That’s where my father was head of the Department of Hematology!  He was a revered physician at Reese, particularly loved by the nurses.  When I told them I was his son, I was not only treated like a General, but complete reports regarding my wounds, initial treatments, condition, etc. were sent on to Dad.

One annoyance at the Bar le duc was  “Bedcheck Charlie.”  This was a little single engine German plane that flew over the hospital at night occasionally, always with the possibility that it would drop a bomb.   At those times we were all ordered to run for cover.  As I remember, that meant getting under our beds.  It never happened while I was there.

Because of the injuries to the nerves in my arm I was put in the neurological ward with men who had similar problems. Next bed to me was a soldier with a head wound that somehow caused complete amnesia.  Every day he managed to remember a little more of the past, but his attempts to recapture his memory caused him such anxiety that he would lie there and cry.  I did try my best to calm him, but doubt I was much help.  His problem went on the entire time I was there and gave me great respect for the mysterious workings of the brain.

Leaving Bar le duc we went across the channel to England.  On that trip I had the first glass of milk in months.  Talk about nectar of the gods!  On to a hospital ship, a converted single deck cargo ship, through winter storms to a short stop at a hospital in New York.  Finally to Mayo General Army Hospital in Galesburg, Illinois where there were specialists in neurological surgery.  Once again I became a “General.”One of the surgeons who did my final operation was also from Michael Reese Hospital as were the nurses at Bar le duc, so Dad was again able to get detailed information as to my progress from this kind doctor.

It was necessary for me to wait for collateral circulation to replace that in the arteries and veins rendered useless from the bullet.  Meanwhile, I had daily rehab to get some strength in the arm.  Nine months later (during which I read every book written by Sinclair Lewis plus many more from the hospital library) the final operation was done successfully.

At exactly the right time to enter college in the fall I was released from the hospital and discharged from the army.

It was made abundantly clear from my brilliant, highly educated mother that what I had just experienced was past history, and I was to get on with my education NOW.  Today I guess they call that tough love.

Through the lucky happenstance of having cousins who were attending, I was introduced to a little school in upstate New York, Bard College, which turned out to be a perfect place for a returned veteran to “get on with my education.”  A quiet, welcome change from the crowded, Spartan existence of the past years, a world class collection of teachers.  Most of my class was made up of veterans, totally different in their level of maturity compared to the few non vet freshmen also entering.  I don’t remember any conversations about the war, our experiences, or any residual problems we might have had attendant to it.  We were there on the GI Bill, which was paying our tuition, and we were all anxious to get in, get out, and get on with our lives.  Money was scarce.  We had to earn a living.  No excuses!  

 

A Gallery of Prominent American Authoriotarians

Here are a few of the more prominent American authoritarians that are occupied with making life miserable for the rest of us. When the blather of a confident and persuasive authoritarian gains a national following, things begin to look like this:

#1.  “I AM THE CHAOS”
Years ago a journalist followed Donald Trump around New York and noticed    the utter confusion that surrounded him. He asked Trump, “Why are you always surrounded by chaos?” To which Trump replied, “I am the chaos.”

This goes a long way towards explaining why Trump has fired so many appointed officials, why he pulled out of the Paris Climate Agreement, and is withholding money from the World Health Organization. It explains much more, including his lies about the pandemic and his inaction during this crisis.  It explains why he has attacked governors over several issues: to take responsibility off his back and to foment discord among Americans and have us take sides.  He is fomenting discord and hatred to the extent that Washington’s Governor Inslee said Trump is “fomenting rebellion.”

Trump is the center of the chaos, but he himself is chaotic—confused, angry, vindictive, a narcissist and bully.  He craves constant national and International attention.  He does not want to build, he seeks to destroy.  Hurling our nation into a pit of fear, confusion, and rage is proof that he exists.   That he is indeed the world’s center.

#2.  FROM SMALL TOWN BIGOT TO NATIONAL MENACE
This man has probably caused more damage to our Republic than any other in the last thirty to forty years. Through his weekday broadcasts he fomented a groundswell of anger and resentment against those with college educations (professors are socialists), against the women’s movement (controlled by “femi-nazis”), and against the main stream media (controlled and staffed by liberals, also known as socialists).

Rush Limbaugh worked his audience like a master puppeteer. He nurtured a hatred against those he called the elite. The elite, he told his followers repeatedly, control this country. They run our lives. And who are they? Liberals in positions of power, particularly East Coast liberals with Ivy League educations. He told his audience that these elitists think they know better than the rest of us how we should live, and what we should think.

Coming from Cape Girardeau, Missouri may have had a lot to do with his message.  Limbaugh comes from a line of Missouri judges, but what status does a back-water Missouri judge have compared to a Harvard trained attorney appointed to (let us say) a New York appellate court? Not much.  I now suspect that the resentment against the East Coast elite that Limbaugh fostered in his audience, and the anger he displays every broadcast, is actually an expression of his own resentment.

I began listening to Limbaugh in 1990. I discovered him by accident as I turned my car’s AM radio dial one day.  I didn’t like what he said; clearly, there was something wrong with him, but the man’s sickness kept me listening for ten or fifteen minutes at a time.

In those early days he criticized Republicans and Democrats alike.  His show, then as now, focused on politics, but in those days he had special segments mocking two areas of news.  These segments reflected the influence of Limbaugh’s idol, Chicago rock jock Larry Lujak. Lujack’s segments, which included “Animal Stories,” “Klunk Letter of the Day, ” and the “Cheap Trashy Show Biz Report,” were inventive, sardonic and very funny.

But Limbaugh’s segments—“Animal Rights Update” and “Homeless Update”— were not funny, unless you thought environmentalism was a crock and the homeless were simply garbage “Born Free,” sung by Andy Williams, was the “Animal Rights Update” theme. Superimposed over the music were the sounds of gunfire and the cries of animals being machine gunned.

In one “Homeless Update,” Limbaugh read a news clipping about a homeless woman who had taken shelter in a dumpster one night and was compacted with the trash the next morning. In another episode, he referred to the homeless as “human debris.”  Limbaugh’s audience ate this up, all of it.

Reflecting back on this now, I see that Limbaugh intended to tap into this large, angry segment of the population.  These included, believe it or not, many well-to-do followers.

In the early 90s, Limbaugh talked endlessly about himself.  As his fame grew, his circle of acquaintances began to embrace well-known conservatives. Whenever he had a conversation with one, or golfed with one, he announced it.   When he had dinner with Pat Buchanan at Commander’s Palace in New Orleans, his listeners heard all about it.

His ego was fragile; he needed applause and he needed to be known as someone who had famous friends.  Out then President George H. Bush knew that Limbaugh had a large listenership, and knew he could be useful.  He invited Limbaugh to the White House, and to stay overnight.

The flattery worked.  We don’t know exactly what was said, but Limbaugh bragged about the visit as soon as he was back at his microphone.  He was a new man: the White House had transformed hm: he was now a solid Republican, and an enemy of Democrats.

#3. THE SINS OF WILLIAM BARR
William Barr was a known authoritarian long before he was selected by Donald Trump to replace fired Attorney General Jeff Sessions. In fact, he was selected because he is an authoritarian.

Barr became nationally known when George H. Bush picked him to head the DOJ. As Bush’s attorney general, the incarceration rate for non-violent drug offenders, mostly black, increased, and private prisons proliferated.

The NAACP document opposing Barr’s appointment as U.S. Attorney General under Trump stated, “Mr. Barr acknowledges that he came into office as [Bush’s] Attorney General with a specific agenda of imposing harsh criminal penalties.”

When riots followed the acquittal of the police who had beaten Rodney King, Barr said the rioting “was not civil unrest or the product of some festering injustice,” but “was gang activity, basically opportunistic.”

The NACCP document states bluntly: “The prospect of Mr. Barr enabling this Administration’s worst undemocratic and authoritarian impulses is deeply troubling.”

The document proved prophetic. Barr is indeed using his authority to undermine the rule of law.
1. He dropped the charges against Michael Flynn, Trump’s national security advisor, who pled guilty to lying to the FBI. In response, two thousand FBI agents and DOJ employees signed an open letter demanding Barr’s resignation.

2. Barr announced the resignation of William Berman, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Berman had not resigned. The Trump administration was simply getting even with Berman for having sentenced Michel Cohen, Trump’s personal attorney, to three years in prison. Berman said he did not resign. Fortunately for us, Barr could not force him from his post since Berman’s appointment came from the Judges of the Southern District of New York

3. To quote the Atlantic (02/17/20): “Perhaps most disturbingly, Barr contends that it is virtually impossible for a corrupt president to be held to account by the Department of Justice, or by any independent counsel that it or Congress might appoint. THIS IS AN EXTREME VERSION OF THE UNITARY EXECUTIVE THEORY. (More later)

4. Also from the Atlantic article: Last May, Barr’s Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion advising that former White House Counsel Don McGahn was not subject to Congress’s subpoena power, asserting that senior officials have “absolute immunity from congressional compulsion to testify about matters that occur during the course of discharging official duties.”

5. Barr’s Office of Legal Counsel also advised the Department of the Treasury not to release Trump’s tax statements.
Despite all these and other actions and statements, Barr contends that he is not Trump’s lapdog.

4.  THE BANALITY OF EVIL
Remember John Yoo? Professor of law at the University of California, Berkeley?

He was Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice from 2001-2003. He wrote the “Torture Memo” for President George H. Bush, which declared that the president has the authority to “torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person’s child . . .” When in 2004 the Justice Department’s Office of Professional

Responsibility investigated Yoo’s work for Bush, Yoo told DOJ investigators that “president’s war-making authority was so broad that he had the constitutional power to order a village to be ‘massacred’.”

Yoo has been advising Trump, directly and indirectly. In June he wrote an article for The National Review in which he claimed that the Supreme Court’s recent decision on DACA “makes it easy for the President to violate the law.” The article was seen on Trump’s desk. Soon afterwards Trump told Fox News Sunday’s Chris Wallace: “The decision by the Supreme Court on DACA allows me to do things on immigration, on healthcare, on other things that we’ve never done before.”

Yoo is one of many powerful men in and out of Washington who embrace the unitary presidential theory. Authoritarians are attracted to the theory like flies to manure. The Federalist Society is a club filled with authoritarians.

The unitary presidential theory goes back at least to the late sixties, early seventies. In essence, it relies upon two foundations: 1) loopholes in the law (which are used to destroy the law), and 2) outright lies. (Remember the non-existent weapons of mass destruction?)

Yoo and his fellow federalists are here to stay, and the threat they pose to our republic is serious.

I look at a photo of Yoo and I am reminded of “Hannah Arendt’s phrase “the banality of evil.”

5.  GUNS DON’T KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE DO!
Who is this guy?

It’s Wayne LaPierre, chief executive of the National Rifle Association.
Does his picture remind you of strong men across the ages who come and go, use and damage a population and then are blown off the pages of history? Sometimes in disgrace?

One strong blast from New York State’s Attorney General Letitia James is now likely to end LaPierre’s shameful career. The attorney general’s office has posted the following: “The suit specifically charges the NRA as a whole, as well as Executive Vice-President Wayne LaPierre” and three other officers, including its former treasurer “with failing to manage the NRA’s funds and failing to follow numerous state and federal laws contributi\ng to the loss of more than $64 million in just three years for the NRA.”

James’ website elaborates: “The NRA’s influence has been so powerful that the organization went unchecked for decades while top executives funneled millions into their own pockets. The NRA is fraught with fraud and abuse, which is why, today, we seek to dissolve the NRA, because no organization is above the law.”

For twenty-nine years LaPierre has headed the NRA and during that time raised its profile from an extremist organization to a dangerous extremist organization. He has made it so powerful that with its millions in campaign contributions it can make and break politicians. He keeps a score card on every state and federal legislator, rating their records on gun legislation. NRA members and sympathizers pay attention to those scores. Thanks to its donations and score cards, NRA lobbyists have successfully blocked any meaningful gun legislation, even as school shootings and public massacres and public outrage continue.

After the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, in which twenty students and six adults were killed, LaPierre held a press conference and told the nation that “The only way to stop a bad guy with a guy is with a good guy with a gun.” He blamed the killings on the “lack of mental health reform and the prevalence of violent video games and movies.” And then called for armed guards in schools.

(Some NRA members went even further, calling for teachers to be armed. Imagine yourself a five, ten, thirteen year old sitting in class while Mr. Jones, with a forty-five tucked into his trouser belt, teaches cursive writing or lectures you on history. Not only that, but you have to practice emergency evacuation drills. How well would you concentrate?)

LaPierre had a lot more to say after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School killings in Parkland, Florida, in which seventeen people were killed and seventeen injured. According to LaPierre, guns were not among the causes of the massacre. The “elites” bore the responsibility.
(Notice he’s picked up Limbaugh’s derisive use of the word “elites.”)

Days after the massacre, LaPierre told the Conservative Political Action Conference that the “elites” have a nasty agenda with their proposed gun laws. “Their solution is to make you ― all of you ― less free.” “They want to sweep right under the carpet the failure of school security, the failure of the family, the failure of America’s school systems and even the unbelievable failure of the FBI.”

(According to LaPIerre, the FBI is in charge of monitoring mentally ill school-age children, not to mention suspected foreign terrorists.)

“The elites,” he said, “don’t care not one whit about America’s school system and school children. If they truly cared, what they would do is they would protect them. For them it’s not a safety issue, it’s a political issue. They care more about control and more of it, their goal is to eliminate the Second Amendment and our firearms freedoms so that they can eradicate all individual freedoms” [emphasis mine.]

Eradicate all individual freedoms. Like Limbaugh and Goebbels, LaPierre learned that if the lie big enough, the masses will swallow it. And like Trump and Roger Stone, LaPierre has learned to deny . . . and deny . . . and deny. Roy Cohn’s teaching endures.
And for all this, LaPierre is well compensated. A 1995 Los Angeles Times story reported that LaPierre earned $190,000 a year, but in 2015, according to the Washington Post, his compensation package was $5 million.

It takes a pair of steel-you-know-whats to go before the nation and spout this stuff. But maybe all it takes is a sociopathic brain that unconsciously hopes to introduce the first act of Armageddon.

But did LaPiere write those words? I’m guessing he did not. For thirty years the NRA has had Ackerman McQueen, an advertising and public relations firm, craft its public image. Most corporations have in-house p.r. flaks to write speeches for the CEO and other officers, but the NRA used Ackerman.
In 2019, the NRA sued Ackerman for what it claimed was inflated billing and for leading it into the swamp of digital media production, which proved disastrous. It sounds like the NRA did not check out digital media production. And as for inflated billing . . . Who was signing those checks? The mail boy?

As a consequence of the lawsuit, Ackerman is firing broadsides at the NRA’s leaking vessel. It has released documents that include a memo from Ackerman claiming that over thirteen years it spent $542,000 of the NRA’s money on LaPierre’s expenses.
The Wall Street Journal reported that between 2004 and 2017, LaPierre spent $274,895.03 on Italian suits at a Hollywood men’s boutique. On one shopping spree alone, he spent $39,000.

At the same time it was suing Ackerman (and because it was going south at warp speed), the NRA paid outside attorney Bill Brewer $24 million to scrutinize its financial dealings and begin a cosmetic make over. Brewer’s work split the NRA into opposing factions, one result of which was the firing of its president, Oliver North, who is now producing documented evidence of NRTA corruption.

Plato got it right: a band of corrupt people end up eating one another.

 

“I AM THE CHAOS”

Years ago a journalist followed Donald Trump around New York and noticed the utter confusion that surrounded him. He asked Trump, “Why are you always surrounded by chaos?” To which Trump replied, “I am the chaos.”

This goes a long way towards explaining why Trump has fired so many appointed officials, why he pulled out of the Paris Climate Agreement, and is withholding money from the World Health Organization. It explains much more, including his lies about the pandemic and his inaction during this crisis. It explains why he has attacked governors over several issues: to take responsibility off his back and to foment discord among Americans and have us take sides. He is fomenting discord and hatred to the extent that Washington’s Governor Inslee said Trump is “fomenting rebellion.”

Trump is the center of the chaos, but he himself is chaotic—confused, angry, vindictive, a narcissist and bully. He craves constant national and International attention. He does not want to build, he seeks to destroy. Hurling our nation into a pit of fear, confusion, and rage is proof that he exists. That he is indeed the world’s center

Review of Plausible Deniability

Plausible Deniability
Robert Gilbert
Piscataqua Press
paperback: $16.99
KIndle: $4.99. Free with Kindle Unlimited

Plausible Deniability is a novel for our time—a time of corporate corruption and a widespread loss of personal integrity.  Author Robert Gilbert presents us with Pete Wendell, a man verging on middle age who trades a respectable job as a reporter at The Wall Street Bulletin (aka Wall Street Journal) for public relations work. But the move also entails trading his integrity for a $140,000 a year salary.

Pete has grown up in New Canaan, Connecticut, a wealthy New York suburb in a family with a cold father and an alcoholic mother subject to fits of depression. His father was CEO of a major oil corporation and unfaithful to his wife, whose death apparently leaves father and son unmoved. Pete has grown up without his father’s approval and is disinherited at the instigation of his step-mother. Nothing he does, no matter what he achieves, can win his father’s approval.

Early on,” Pete tells the reader, “I stopped trying to meet the expectations of my father, whose management training taught him that withholding praise increases employees’ performance, if not a son’s. Yet he retained one unbroken grip on my ambitions. I coveted his lifestyle and adopted his basis for happiness—acquire more.”

That is a strong motive for returning to New Canaan, a town he doesn’t seem to have cared for, and buying a house with Libby, his wife, whom he met at the Bulletin. Pete is now in corporate communications at the country’s largest computer manufacturer. His wife tells him he’s writing puff pieces, propaganda. He tells her he’s not being dishonest, to which she replies, “You’re being dishonest with yourself.”

His boss asks him how to deal with a reporter at the Bulletin over a a potentially hazardous product that was recalled for giving some users electrical shocks. The boss fudges the truth and a possible nightmare is averted. Pete’s reaction is between “elation and shame.”

With skillful narration, Gilbert lays the ground for the heart of the novel. First, Pete’s wife is killed by a hit and run driver, and a bit later, he is fired. Then he’s diagnosed with Parkinson’s and afterwards lands communications work with a firm that dispenses how-to wisdom to corporate managers who know what their fate will be if company shares fall. We’re now into the heart of the book, which gives us relentlessly aggressive characters lacking moral compass and conscience.  As Pete becomes enmeshed in their world, he continues to compromise himself. Still mourning over his wife’s death, struggling to pay his mortgage, and still carrying the burden of his father’s indifference, he drinks heavily and comes to work hungover while his self-respect sinks lower.

His job calls for him to fudge or distort or twist the truth just enough to b.s. the journalist or whomever he’s b.s.ing. Hence the title: Plausible Deniability.

Pete’s passage through hell is believable and painful. Yes, there is a turnaround for this character, or at least we think he may have finally gotten a grip on himself, but Gilbert promises nothing.

This is the kind of novel you can’t write unless you’ve been there.

God Sent Covid-19

A sermon by one of the saved is always a treat and an opportunity for me to amend my ways and hopefully avoid hell fire. But I especially enjoy fundamentalist discussions, which always drill down to the heart of a matter. Let us say that Pastor Joe and his fellow theologians are sitting around on living room sofas with a fire blazing in the background. The pattern of discussion is always the same.

Whatever comment Pastor Joe makes about this or that book of the Bible, or whatever judgement he makes on whatever topic, the others in the round table will say, “Right on, brother Joe” or “Amen! Praise Jesus!” It doesn’t matter if Pastor Joe has just done a line of coke and blown the words out of his backside, the response is always, “Amen, brother.” At which point the other theologians will add their own examples to bolster Pastor Joe’s point.

A week ago I listened to four Christian fundamentalists discussing the End Times. This topic has elicited excitement among evangelicals for hundreds of years but in recent decades it has gone full throttle. One of the preachers in this morning group brought up the covid-19 pandemic, an immensely significant sign from God, he said. The others nodded and gave assent.

But the preacher went further and said God sent this virus , this plague, to awaken lost souls and bring them to Jesus. The rest of the round table agreed with him. “Amen, brother!”

Here are four very sick, mentally disturbed men claiming that God has brought enormous pain to nearly four million people worldwide and death to hundreds of thousands, including innocent children. He is doing this, they all agreed, so that others may see that Jesus is their lord and savior. Jesus, as God manifest, scarified himself on the cross for us, but is now killing hundreds of thousands because he needs followers. I believe that this is the heart and soul of American fundamentalism: cruel and stupid.

Notes to The Coming Tsunami:

The Triumph of the Irrational
The Irrational is now nothing less than a demonic force driving us individually and collectively. With Technique now its chiefest expression, self-destructive instruments proliferate. Consider agriculture. First, crop production, which relies upon pesticides, herbicides, and chemical fertilizers. These are highly sophisticated techniques created initially to solve the problem of production. Pesticides and herbicides contain known carcinogens. For example, Dyfonate, used for root worm control, is not biodegradable, and its ingredients are the same as those used in biological and chemical warfare.

Glyphosate, the key ingredient in Round-up, is used to kill milkweed in roadside ditches and so contributes to the decline of the Monarch population. The Greenpeace website “Bees in Decline” cites studies demonstrating a link between insecticides and the decline of honey bees. Two of our most important pollinators are being decimated by industrial agriculture.

In the Midwest, hundreds of thousands of acres of corn and soybeans require millions of gallons of synthesized chemicals. When these chemicals were introduced, most farmers chose to abandon millennia of farming practices and embrace artificial methods promoted by the federal government, state universities, the Farm Bureau and, above all by the belief that Science can solve all problems.

Nitrogen fertilizer, which is applied to millions of acres of corn crops, runs off into the Mississippi River, which delivers the nitrogen and phosphorus to the Gulf of Mexico where it kills the algae, which in turn depletes the oxygen, which results in massive fish kills.

Now consider animal production. Faced with a demand for increased production, the rationalist’s solution was to create animal confinements into which thousands of chickens or turkeys are thrown together, almost on top of one another. In the case of hogs, hundreds are placed in individual cages within a shed containing a thousand total. Confinement operations increase the animal’s susceptibility to infectious disease. Technicians solved that problem by adding antibiotics to the feed. If the antibiotics are in the animal long enough, the targeted bacteria become resistant to the antibiotics and, if their meat is improperly cooked, make us ill. In short, the cure for production, rational in essence, is ultimately self-destructive.

The genetic engineering of plants and animals is another example of the Irrational posing as the Rational. The hubris of the project is mythical in its dimensions: man playing God with Nature by redesigning plants and animals.
Since monocultures dominate agriculture, corporations want their redesigned corn or salmon the only source of corn or salmon. Since they have decoded the DNA for a multitude of plants and animals, corrupt courts have allowed them to register patents on these works of Nature. Now the variety of this corn or rice or wheat is owned by corporation X, and the peasants who have grown this wheat or corn for millennia, and continue to d so, will be prosecuted.

The engineer says the animal can be redesigned for its own good. I heard this in a presentation at a conference on the ethical treatment of farm animals given at Johns Hopkins University by a geneticist and engineer who advocated applying CRISPR technology to chickens in confinement. CRISPR uses a protein to cut an unwanted strand of DNA from the double helix, or it could introduce a strand of DNA with a factor that the operator wants to introduce. In the case of chickens, the engineer suggested that a strand of DNA that would induce an opiate high could be inserted into chickens to make confinement life bearable. Not only is this engineering of Nature repugnant, it and similar uses of CRISPR would lead us down a very dark road where any and all organisms, animal and vegetable, would be subject to the whims of engineers and corporations.

In city design, given the irrational impulse is to cluster together as many businesses as possible, real estate prices rise, which means that office buildings will be as tall as possible, cramming as many people as possible onto floors and into rooms, working like trained monkeys in cubicles. Often these same people live in high rise apartments or condominium complexes, paying exorbitant sums for the privilege. The result is a further atomization of society—the alienation of people from one another, and from the earth. But this mode of working and living is considered rational, for it makes the best use of space, ignoring the fact that it runs counter to human needs, with the consequence that it promotes alienation, which in turn promotes aggression and anti-social behavior.

Ironically, Reason demands predictability. We plug a cord into an outlet and expect a vacuum cleaner to turn on or an iron to heat. We flip a switch and a light goes on. We expect that predictability and efficiency with the internet, and so all of our systems and major institutions—banking and finance, energy, the Defense Department, all major retailers, hospitals, universities, manufacturers, and more—store all their information on it.. We have allowed ourselves to become entirely dependent on the internet, which is the central nervous system of our economic body. Should the internet collapse, so would the economy and all life systems. Our energy grid, for example, is vulnerable to foreign government hacking. Shut down the energy grid and all else collapses. In the meantime, we are dealing with hackers who penetrate company and government computer systems and steal data. We do not know how much Defense Department data has been stolen (we know some has) but we all know that hackers have stolen customers’ social security numbers and banking information from large retail chains.

Reason Begot Technique
Technique, the child of Reason, has released the demonic from the modern psyche, thereby unleashing unbelievable violence upon the world. The causes for this are many, but one is surely the elimination of most meaningful work, with the result that men and women who once had vocations are now working at servile jobs—tending machines, selling insurance, selling goods, working a cash register. This is work to which no one is called. Dominated in so many other ways by omni-present Technique, the mass of people are just that—a mass, a collection. No longer living in community, and alienated from their fellows, deprived of meaningful work, and knowing that they are mere things, their anger boils up. Is it any wonder then that reports of mass killings fill the news almost weekly? It is time that we realized that an individual deprived of meaningful work, locked inside a pressure cooker, will inevitably explode.

Anger and fear of government inspires men and women to stockpile arms and ammunition. White cops murder unarmed black men and women. One black man is shot sixteen times in the back. A young black woman, babysitting her cousin, is shot by a white cop through a window.

Skinheads spray paint swastikas on synagogues. Confederate flags wave at rallies. The Klan rises again. The urge to kill bubbles up.

In a meaningless universe, one is compelled to commit acts of violence and greed just to feel alive. Greed ratchets up. Bankers commit massive fraud, sending tens of thousands of people onto the streets. America’s biggest banks stagger, but the president bails them out and not one banker goes to jail. Knowing themselves to be immune from prosecution, Welles Fargo later sets up thousands of phony accounts and bilks people for the charges. When discovered, Welles Fargo is fined, but again, no one goes to jail. But if caught, there is no shame, no shame is being convicted of a felony, no shame in going to prison, only regret at having been caught.

In a world where Power dictates Right, the morally unfit are appointed to the Supreme Court and a mentally ill and morally depraved man is elected chief executive of the United States.

Right wing foundations fund global warming denial. And while the polar ice caps melt billions are spent on a space program to capture footage of planets, stars, asteroids, galaxies. Technicians anticipate the day we will plant colonies on Mars because Earth has become uninhabitable.

Forty-one million Americans, including 13 million children, struggled with hunger in 2016, according to the USDA’s Economic Research Service. Our sins against humanity multiply.

Our sins against Nature multiply. The Government agency charged with protecting the environment strikes two regulations off the books for every one it enacts. Two hundred species, more or less, go extinct each day around the globe.

Hydraulic fracturing poisons drinking water in Wyoming, California and Pennsylvania.

Since Nature is simply a stockpile of goods, the tops of Appalachian mountains are leveled for coal and the sides of Rocky mountains are sheered in half, top to bottom, for their minerals.

The Elimination of the Human Presence
Now we have artificial intelligence and robots that replace assembly line workers; today we need only supervisors to supervise the robots.

Robots are omni-present. They speak to us when we call a company and have questions about products and services.

We have driverless cars and a stock market where massive trading occurs in nanoseconds on the command of an algorithm. The purposive human being is fast becoming an irrelevance.

Why? Because the individual is a cipher, merely a thing that keeps the economy moving. Mr. and Mrs. Smith are things. The enemy combatant and the suspected enemy combatant are things, therefore we will do with them whatever we want: feed a “lunch tray” of pureed pasta and hummus into their rectums, water board them, do anything we want. We label these acts “renditions” and “enhanced interrogations,” never torture. And we continue to torture even though we know it produces lies. We enjoy it.

***

Sartre was wrong: there is an exit. Most will not take it: disengagement from the values and treasures of the Mass, including the core beliefs of rationalists. So long as the active intellect is in charge, there is no exit. The glimmers of an exit lie in discovering access to what Meister Eckhart called the passive intellect. But this calls for surrender, which in turn calls for humility.

But what is the passive intellect?

See my related essay: “Gods of the Modern World”:

 

Globalism, the Power Complex and the Need for Decentralization

The following is an excerpt from the prologue to Building the Agricultural City

The Agricultural City
The title for this book was inspired by the phrase “agricultural city,” coined by Chicago architect Joe Lambke. Joe used the phrase in the title of a pamphlet which described his vision of a possible future for northeast Iowa. In Joe’s vision, the towns and villages of this four-county rural area in northeast Iowa would be considered as nodes of population within one unit—an agricultural city. Unlike the cities we habitually envision, this one would be comprised primarily of farmland, with agriculture the glue that bound cities, villages, towns and farms together.

I learned about Joe in the early 1990s when I was pondering the problem of rural economic development. I discussed it with Bill Burke, the city planner for Waukon, Iowa, and told him of my own vision for regional development. Bill then mentioned Joe and told me that Joe had submitted a proposal to ten northeast Iowa towns for cooperative economic development. He gave me a copy of the proposal.

I called Joe and we met, many times, in Chicago and in northeast Iowa. But eventually we lost touch. Joe went on to design furniture and buildings, but the notion of an agricultural city stayed with me, and in 1994 I wrote a six-part editorial for Iowa Public Radio, “Developing Regional, Rural Economies.” This won the Sigma Delta Chi Award and Bronze Medal from the Society of Professional Journalists for Best Radio Editorial of the year. The Des Moines Register reprinted it one Sunday for their lead editorial, and that, as far as the public was concerned, was pretty much the end of it.

But I continued pondering how a cluster of cities might collaborate; my ideas are sketched in chapter one of part two. Here it is enough to say that I envisioned several Agricultural Cities in Iowa, in Wisconsin, and in Minnesota, but only one in the small portion of northwest Illinois’ that is in the Driftless.
For the next decade I continued to write and publish essays on regionalism and conducted and published two regional surveys. None of these efforts attracted much more notice than a corpse in a funeral home.

The End of a World
Lewis Mumford coined the apt phrase “Power Complex,” indicating the convergent forces in government, industry, finance, and military that control our society. But the Power Complex, as increasing numbers of people see, is in its last years, and unless sufficient numbers of people can agree on what a sustainable culture might look like, and begin working to achieve it, chaos and violence will follow the approaching collapse.

The desire for unlimited control, which is the goal of the Power Complex, is a telling instance of rigidity: it is persistent and undeviating. It has an autonomous life, for as one set of leaders retires or dies, another set—a virtual carbon copy—replaces it. The Power Complex is rigid in its dogma of free trade and unrestrained competition. Everyone everywhere must see things as it does. If not, it will force compliance, as John Perkins testified in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. A healthy society is defined in part by its ability to make self-corrective measures; whereas dogmatism and the desire for total control are forms of rigidity, and rigidity is a sign of death.

Conversely, flexibility and adaptability are signs of life and health. As the seventy-sixth verse of the Tao Teh Ching says, “When living, man is supple and yielding; when dead, man is hard and stiff. When living, all animals and plants are soft and pliant; when dead, they are withered and brittle. Thus, being inflexible and unyielding is part of dying; being flexible and yielding is part of living.” Like a belief system before it dies, a civilization rigidifies as it atrophies: dominant beliefs become dogma, and the civilization becomes incapable of adapting to change, incapable of self-corrective, rectifying measures.
The great internal contradiction within the Power Complex is that since it has lost its manufacturing base, since its financial empire is built upon mere speculation, and since the United States government is deeply in debt, the search for total world control is illusory. Worse, it is delusional.

Regionalism and Possibility
A new world, now in embryo, is struggling to be born. Human scale communities and human scale sustainable institutions are arising around the planet, and they are arising in reaction to the inhumanity and self-destructive tendencies of the present system.

As of this writing small community discussion groups on various facets of community sustainability are meeting regularly in cities as well as rural towns. People across the country from all walks of life now share an increased sense of the urgency with which their locality, their region, must become more self-reliant, more self-sufficient. They may seldom articulate exactly what needs doing, but they know that our present system is falling apart.

Over the past few years increasing numbers of people have been promoting local food systems, local energy production, and community development banks as means by which to restrict the reach of transnational corporations and large urban banks into every corner of our economic and cultural life. They are understood to be a means by which to retain more dollars within local economies. Now what some people are coming to realize is that local strategies for economic sustainability can be applied on a regional level.

Bob Wills in Roy, New Mexico

By Rudy Gonzales

Note: Rudy Gonzales lives in Tucumcari, New Mexico and wrote this story during a writing workshop I conducted there in 2010. Rudy is a retired sign painter and a man with a lot of stories about the old days in Roy. Ken Burns recent history of Country Music prompted me to post this and give some little known information on Wills. What Rudy writes  is confirmed in Wikipedia.

I was raised in Roy, New Mexico where the events I will talk about took place. What I am about to talk about was related to me by my father. My father was Diego Gonzales. He was a barber by trade, and very well known at that time in Harding County. Barbershops were kind of local meeting places.

My dad played the fiddle and usually had a fiddle handy in the barbershop. During this period there were a lot of local violinists who would drop in to play with my dad when he wasn’t busy attending to a customer. Usually guitar players would accompany him.

Roy, New Mexico

On the day in question, my dad was playing his violin during a break from barbering. He was being accompanied by a well-known local man named Adolph Romero. I’m not certain whether Adolph was playing the banjo or the guitar. He could play both instruments. He was the only banjo player that I know of who lived in Harding County.

During the time my dad was playing, a stranger walked in. He was dressed in overalls and looked like a typical farmer. My father asked if he wanted a haircut. The stranger said he just wanted to listen to the playing. My dad continued to play and then a customer walked in. My dad placed the fiddle in the fiddle case and proceeded to attend to his customer. The stranger then addressed my dad. He said, “Mister, do you mind if I play your fiddle?”

My dad replied, “You’re welcome to.”

Bob Wills

My dad told me he thought to himself, “He’s welcome to play my fiddle, but I’ve never seen a gringo farmer that could play worth a damn.” The stranger then proceeded to play. My dad and Adolph Romero were pleasantly shocked! The stranger was a great fiddler. His name was Bob Wills!

It seems he was traveling through small towns looking for work in a barbershop. He had recently graduated from barber school in Amarillo, I believe.

After the initial introductions, my dad and Adolph proceeded to plan a dance at the local dance hall. The owners were to rent or lend the dance hall free of charge. Dances were well attended and attracted a large clientele to the bar, thus benefiting everyone.

The word was quickly passed on that there would be a dance and that a very good fiddler would play with the local musicians.

During this period, there were many fiddlers in Roy and Harding County. It was the custom for fiddlers to take turns playing, allowing the contracted musicians to have a brief respite.

Bob Wills

Bob Wills was introduced to the local musicians and played regularly during his stay in Roy. Some of the musicians he played with were Abram Vargas, a locally renowned fiddler, and his two brothers, Juan and Mark Tafoya, names now probably known only to very old people. I am fortunate enough to have known these gentlemen. Unfortunately, I met them several years after Bob Wills left Roy. Another fiddler, probably lot younger at the time was Abenicio Salazar, known as “Abe.” Abe had very fond memories of the events I am relating and filled some of the gaps that my dad hadn’t told me.

I am not exactly sure of the time these events took place or how long Bob Wills resided in Roy. But it was probably in the thirties. It is known that he composed the music to “San Antonio Rose” in Roy, but had titled it “Mexican Two Step.” He later changed it to “San Antonio Rose” when he auditioned to play on a radio station somewhere in Texas. His prospective employer liked the tune but said that he needed lyrics to go with the tune. Supposedly, Bob and his accompanist retired to his home and in one afternoon wrote the lyrics that became famous.

When Bob Wills decided to leave Roy, he asked my dad to accompany him. He had plans of starting a band.

My dad told me that Bob Wills really like my dad’s violin and attempted to buy it from him. My dad was very attached to his fiddle and wouldn’t sell it. My dad said Bob invited him to a local bar and proceeded to try and intoxicate him and convince him to sell his fiddle. My dad refused and accompanied Bob to the train depot. Years later, my dad learned that Bob had become famous.

Years later I learned to make and repair fiddles in order to repair my dad’s, which had been severely damaged. When I made my first fiddle I visited Abe Salazar in Las Vegas, New Mexico to show him my fiddle. It was then that he filled me in on the details of Bob Wills’ attempt to buy my dad’s fiddle. He told me that after my dad refused to sell his fiddle, Bob said that if he wouldn’t sell him the whole fiddle, would he sell him only the neck. That he would pay for a new neck to replace my dad’s. My dad refused.

A sign by Rudy Gonzales

There are no fiddlers left in Harding County [Roy is in Hardin County] and only a few in Tucumcari. Violin music was very popular in the forties and fifties. Unfortunately, most of the younger generation prefers to play guitars. I love guitar music also, but would love to hear more fiddle music.

To learn about Free River Press writing workshops: www.freeriverpress.org

Read my article on Nashville honkytonks: Honkytonks and Penguins: www.robertwolfthewriter.com › 2018/05/12 › penguins-and-honktonks

REGIONALISM: AN IDEA WHOSE TIME HAS COME

For nearly 30 years I have advocated for the regional decentralization of the United States. We are simply too big with too many cumbersome bureaucracies. We are too complex. We have gone beyond human scale, into an impersonal, inhuman world. We need to rethink size and consider  the advantages of regional cultures and regional industries. The following is an excerpt from my book, Building the Agricultural City: A Handbook for Rural Renewal

What is regionalism?
—Regionalism is the means by which we can reconstruct society with a human face—if we have the collective will to do it.

—Regionalism is a form of decentralization, and is at odds with our overly centralized system, which seeks to impose uniformity in every sphere of activity.

—A sustainable economy within a region will not impose an agricultural or manufacturing system that has no place within it. Its economy is built on the sustainable use of its resources.

—Regionalism creates a home for us. People find greater identification within an area demarcated by a common topography than with an area described by arbitrary state boundaries.

—Regionalism fosters local production over the importation of goods.

—Regionalism fosters a regional culture.

—Regionalism can enable rural America to maintain population. The development of local businesses and the encouragement of entrepreneurs create jobs within the region, enabling the population to stabilize and grow.

—Regionalism is a collective art. The process of getting people to participate on a large scale will take time; but getting people on board, a few at a time, eventually creates a momentum that attracts greater numbers.

WHAT REGIONALISM IS NOT

Regionalism is not an exercise in fence building. Regional boundaries are indeterminate. There are no sharp demarcat ions between adjacent ecosystems.

—The regional societies that may evolve will not be governmental units. They will not have legal status. They will consist of a network of contracts and agreements between privately owned businesses, corporations, and
governments—federal, county and municipal. They will, of necessity, carry on trade nationally and internationally.

Regions as viable economic and cultural entities will not be the product of any governmental body. They will only originate with and grow through grassroots efforts.